- About Us
- Job Openings
- Quick Links
- Calibration iPortal
- CPT Bulletins
- Press Releases
- Forensic Assignment Form
- ISO 9001 Certificate
- ISO/IEC 17025:2017 (A2LA)
- Nadcap Accreditation
- Transparency of Coverage
- ATS Family
Powder Coating Thickness Testing
Every industry wants its equipment to keep working as long as possible – no one has the time or money to constantly replace failing equipment. Ferrous metals such as carbon steel are especially susceptible over time to environmental attack caused by moisture, salinity, and other concerns. To combat these problems, it is best to protect your outdoor equipment with a paint coating. Taking various aspects into account, such as affordability and scope of the project, many industrial companies choose powder coating over liquid paint.
Powder coating is applied differently than liquid paint. To use a wet paint method, first apply a primer to the substrate so that the paint will stick to it. The coating (made up of pigments for color and solvents for consistency) then dries over a long period of time – it bonds to the substrate and solidifies into a thin, protective layer. Powder coating works in a different way; the applicator applies a positive electrostatic charge to the powder, which is shot at the grounded substrate. The powder is magnetically attracted to the substrate and sticks to it until baked for a short period of time to solidify its bond into a thick, even layer.
Making the Case for Powder Coating Over Wet Paint
Each coating method has pros and cons that makes one better suited over the other depending on the project. However, powder coating is the preferred coating solution for industrial use for various reasons which are covered below.
Firstly, powder coating is more durable than wet paint. Wet paint dries due to the evaporation of the solvents that make it a liquid, and then hardens as the remaining contents bond and adhere to the substrate. This process sometimes results in a brittle coating that lacks the flexibility to painlessly adjust to metal’s expansion and contraction in varying temperatures. Brittleness in this case leads to cracks in the coating, which allow corrosive agents to access the substrate underneath. Powder Coating dries due to a heat reaction as it is baked onto its substrate. Crosslinking, the chemical formation of bonds between two polymers, occurs when the powder is heated to a certain temperature in a specialized oven. This process yields a more flexible coating that is less prone to cracking. It also produces a thicker and more even coat than does wet paint, the latter of which requires multiple applications to get an even coat. Powder coating’s overall resistance to wear and tear is far superior to that of wet paint, which requires more refinishes and touch-ups over the course of its lifetime.
Wet paint is more dangerous to use than powder coating as well. Wet paint is highly flammable before and during application due to the chemical characteristics of its organic solvents, while powders are far less flammable because of their lack of that same ingredient. Most solvents (which evaporate into the air as paint dries) also contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that are harmful to human health if inhaled. Finally, VOCs are an environmental hazard known to help create smog, and thus are regulated by the EPA. None of these safety concerns apply when using powder coating methods.
Furthermore, powder coating is easier to use and more efficient in its application than wet paint. Both a steady hand and a specific method are required to get a visually appealing, even coat of liquid paint, as it is prone to dripping and other defects if applied incorrectly. Powder coating, on the other hand, goes on even and smooth, due to the magnetic interaction between the charged powder and the grounded substrate. Overspray represents an efficiency concern in the paint world, both causing visual defects in the product and wasting costly paint on unintended surfaces. While it is a common trouble with inappropriately handled wet paint, overspray accounts for a much smaller factor in powder coating: the latter method has a better adhesion rate to its substrates, and excess powder used can be collected and reprocessed to decimate waste.
This abundance of benefits that powder coating offers over wet paint – increased performance, more durable, less toxic, more environmentally friendly, easier to use, and more efficient to apply – have led to its increasing popularity among various industries.
Testing Coating Thickness
Ensuring that equipment coatings have a certain thickness is important in maintaining their effectiveness at protecting their substrates. Whether initially checking before the powder cures or re-examining the thickness after the coating has been in use for some time, a good thickness reading ensures extended life for any outdoor equipment.
Both types of coating thickness are measured in mils, which indicates one one-thousandth (1/1000) of an inch. Wet paint tends to yield thinner coatings per application than do powder coatings, due to the evaporation of solvents in the former’s drying process.
Powder coating thickness can be measured in many ways, but they all fall under two general categories:
Testing before curing, used in quality control during production, is measuring the thickness of the powder itself before it crosslinks into the resulting, even coating. Two of the methods, involving a comb and a probe respectively, measure the height of the powder – the thickness is determined by factoring the reduction factor against the height measurement. Both methods displace powder to take a measurement, which may lead to an imperfection in the coating after curing. These methods help establish that the coating is sufficiently thick during production but do nothing to help after the equipment has been cured.
The third method uses an ultrasonic reader, which is non-destructive, to predict the thickness of the cured coating. Testing after curing, more commonly used in quality control inspections performed after the equipment is already in use, can be achieved in multiple ways:
Mechanical Magnetic Gauges: stick a magnet onto the test material and then pull it off – amount of pressure needed to separate gauge from coating determines thickness
Electronic Magnetic Gauges: stick a charged probe onto the test material and get a reading
Ultrasonic Gauge: stick a probe onto the test material – it sends out an ultrasonic pulse that travels through the coating, hits the substrate, and bounces back. Converts the time lapse to a thickness reading
Micrometer: measure thickness of substrate with coating vs substrate without coating – difference is coating thickness
ATS and Thickness Testing
Applied Technical Services, Inc. conducts all manner of thickness testing for equipment coating after it has cured. Our experienced personnel are able to perform these tests either in the field or in the lab. As one feature of a larger overall inspection project, we often implement Ultrasonic Thickness Testing to ensure that equipment coatings remain at the manufacturer-standard thickness – or alert clients if our measurements indicate an insufficient thickness. For clients that need to send a part in to the lab for a more intensive test, such as a chemical or environmental analysis, we will also take a coating thickness measurement in the interest of offering the most comprehensive service possible.
For over 50 years, Applied Technical Services has provided a long list of testing and engineering consulting services to satisfied clients from a variety of industries. Allow us to ensure that your critical equipment is properly protected by supplying accurate thickness testing at a competitive price.